Does Removing Rent Control Really Lower Prices? The Buenos Aires Experiment
All right, everyone buckle up, because today we’re diving into a real head-scratcher. We’re talking rent control, but with a twist. We’re looking at a case in Buenos Aires, where they got rid of rent control. And instead of prices going up like you might expect, something unexpected happened—more apartments became available, and they actually got cheaper! Wild, right?
At first glance, it seems counterintuitive. Rent control is often seen as the answer to housing affordability, but this case challenges those typical assumptions. Let’s dig into why Buenos Aires’ decision to remove rent control led to surprising outcomes.
How Was Rent Control in Buenos Aires Different?
Rent control in Buenos Aires wasn’t the usual “cap on rent increases” policy. Instead, it was based on strict lease restrictions. Landlords were required to rent their property for at least three years and had to accept payment in pesos—Argentina’s notoriously unstable currency. For landlords, this was far from ideal.
Think about it. If you’re a landlord worried about inflation, locking yourself into a three-year lease with a fluctuating currency is a risky move. The fear of losing money over time leads to two major outcomes: landlords either jack up the initial rent to hedge against inflation or decide not to rent the property at all. Fewer rentals meant higher demand, and soon enough, Buenos Aires had a housing crunch.
What Happened After Rent Control Was Removed?
Here’s where it gets interesting. When Buenos Aires removed these rent control measures, landlords had more incentive to put their properties back on the market. With fewer restrictions, they could rent out their properties without worrying about the three-year rule or the unstable peso.
And guess what? More apartments became available, competition increased, and prices began to stabilize. Landlords were finally able to set rents that made sense, and tenants had more options. It’s a perfect example of how easing restrictions can sometimes create more affordable housing, rather than the other way around.
What About Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)?
Another piece of this puzzle is accessory dwelling units (ADUs), which are smaller living spaces like basement apartments or in-law suites. These often remain untapped potential in cities because regulations make renting them out a hassle. The situation in Buenos Aires was no different.
Homeowners with ADUs were reluctant to rent them out because of the strict lease rules. Why go through all that trouble for a three-year commitment when you could just keep the space for yourself? But when those rent control measures were removed, suddenly, renting out an ADU became a lot more appealing. More ADUs on the market meant more housing options overall.
The Filtering Effect and New Construction
This whole situation also ties into what economists call the “filtering effect.” When new luxury apartments are built, it might seem like they’ll only drive rents up, but it’s more complex than that. Wealthier tenants move into those new buildings, freeing up older, more affordable apartments. This domino effect can help stabilize rents lower down the market, as competition for the pricier units decreases.
Buenos Aires experienced this in real time. As new units came on the market, the increased supply created more opportunities for tenants to find affordable housing. It’s a reminder that sometimes, more housing supply—whether it’s through new construction or easing regulations—can be a more effective way to control rent than simply capping prices.
Why This Doesn’t Work Everywhere
Of course, what works in one city might not work in another. For example, Ontario, Canada, tried removing rent control on new buildings to encourage more construction and bring down prices. But the results were mixed. Without addressing other factors like zoning laws and land availability, simply removing rent control didn’t automatically solve the housing crisis.
And then there’s Boston. When they abolished rent control in the 90s, rents skyrocketed. The key takeaway here is that housing markets are incredibly complex, and there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. Every city has its own unique set of circumstances that will influence how policies affect the market.
FAQ
What made Buenos Aires’ rent control different from other cities?
In Buenos Aires, rent control involved strict lease requirements—landlords had to rent out their properties for at least three years and accept payment in pesos. This added risk for landlords, especially with inflation, which discouraged them from renting out properties.
How did removing rent control help lower prices in Buenos Aires?
When the rent control measures were removed, more landlords put their properties back on the market. With more competition, rental prices stabilized, and more apartments became available, increasing supply and lowering demand.
What is the filtering effect in housing?
The filtering effect occurs when high-end, luxury apartments become available, and wealthier tenants move into them. This frees up older, more affordable apartments, which can lead to lower rents at different levels of the housing market.
Did removing rent control in other cities have the same effect?
No, not always. For example, when rent control was removed in Boston, rents increased dramatically. In Ontario, Canada, removing rent control didn’t lead to a significant drop in prices. Local factors like land availability and construction regulations play a big role.
Are accessory dwelling units (ADUs) part of the solution?
Yes, ADUs are smaller, rentable spaces like in-law suites or basement apartments. When regulations are eased, homeowners are more likely to rent out these spaces, adding to the overall housing supply and potentially lowering rents.
Your Hosts
Alex & Maria
Join Alex Thompson and Maria Davis as they navigate the fascinating world of knowledge. With their combined expertise and passion for learning, they simplify the complex and make every episode a journey worth taking.